Detailed Product Description

> Type: AR/EB HPS/MH 175W Power: 175W

Characteristic of Input		Characteristic of Output
Rated Voltage (V)	110V240V	Harmonic Distortion	<10%
Input current (A)	0.751.58A	Crest Factor	<1.50
Frequency (Hz)	50/60HZ	Frequency (Hz)	25100KHz
Power Factor	>0.99	Loss of Input Watts (%)	<10%
		Energy Saving	30%

> Report of Comparison by Testing
Results from comparison of AR/EB and conventional MB driving 175W MH lamp and 250W MH lamp, respectively

Type	250W MB(with capacitor & ignitor) + 250W MH Lamp	175W AR/EB +175W MH Lamp
Energy Usage kwh	19.224	12.384
CurrentA	1.339	0.857
VoltageV	220.9	219.4
Harmonic Distortion	24.3%	5.6%
Power Factor	0.876	0.998
Lumens output (lux.)	145	156
Energy saving		35.58%

Testing conditions: outdoor, factory, building and business lighting with MB and AR/EB
Comparison of Performance and Consumption(Consumption RMB 0.60/kWh)
We test a group of MH lamps (100pcs) with 250W MH + 250W MB (with capacitor) systems. Then we tested the MH lamps with 175W MH + AR/EB 175W. The lamps were powered on 12 hours per day.
Results are as follows:

Ballast Type	Consumption(KW/h)	Consumption/Yr	Charge/Yr.	Charge/Pcs	Luminous flux
MB 250W w/ capacitor	0.267×100	116,946	70,167.60	701.68	20500
AR/EB 175W	0.172×100	75,336	45,201.60	452.02	21879
Results	Save 35.58%	Save 35.58%	Save 24,966.00	Save 249.66

*According to this table,if we use AR/EB, we can save RMB 24,966.00 per year; and total luminous flux was increased by 6.7%
The examples only show direct energy saving. With the AR/EB, you can acquire more saving as follows:
It has a power factor greater than 0.99 and total harmonic distortion less than 10%. Therefore it has very little influence on the electronic web. It consumes 50% less power than MB, thus reducing cost of investment and ease the maintenance of power equipments such as, total power circuit, transformer, etc.